Many see the emerging HTML5 web
standard as the way forward to address many of today’s challenges. Irrespective
of device, as long as you have access to the web HTML5 and a browser you are
connected. But then we have the vested interest of Hollywood and others who are
fixated on control and locking up access.
Today the body responsible for developing
HTML5 standards, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), is locked in an
ideological battle with bodies such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
Should we care –Yes. Will the outcome impact us – Yes.
The EFF have stated publicly their
case online, ‘Why the HTML5
Standard Fight Matters’
The battle is over the proposed
Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) to HTML5, which may sound little but threaten
to lock up media content under all browsers and effectively port the cumbersome
and consumer un-centric world of DRM onto the World Wide Web, or as we all know
it, the Internet. The EFF are far from alone in the battle and some 27 rights
groups and others have
written directly to Sir Berners-Lee stating their opposition.
Some have argued that far from
an open interoperable web we could have images and pages that cannot be saved
or searched, a situation where ads cannot be blocked, browsers become
restricted and much of we enjoy today is effectively controlled under the big
content companies. It would be like have DRM applied by many over all the
internet.
In response, W3C chief
executive Jeffrey Jaffe writing on the subject
clearly recognises that EME is contentious
but says that the proposed EME specification ‘only defines Application
Programming Interfaces (APIs) that would provide access to content decryption
modules (CDMs), part of Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems.’ In other
words they are merely creating the hooks into HTML5 and not the CDM /DRM technology
that could be used by others to create their ‘walled gardens.’
It is clearly a battle between
those who value interoperability, access and the principles under which the W3C
have worked and the vested and of the major media companies who want to lock up
access to material within the Internet.
We may not be able to influence
the outcome but ultimately it is the consumer who will either enjoy the interoperable
and openly available fruits of HTML5, or find they are inaccessible, or hidden,
behind many walled gardens.
No comments:
Post a Comment