Nielsen's
2014 annual review of the music industry has negative signs in front of chain
store sales (-20%), total new album sales (-14%), and sales of new songs online
(-10.3%), with only positive signs in front of streaming music and vinyl album
sales. This is despite CD sales in the US generating some $141 million last
year.
Many
believe that the book trade should learn from the digital revolution that is
taking place within the music business. The reality is that the music business
is very different and right across the music business there is both evolution
and revolution. Some changes happening quickly and completely killing off the
past, whilst others are slowly evolving. From creator to consumer digital
change is taking place.
We
see many changes at the consumer end. Technology has replaced the preceding technology.
Eight track was replaced by cassette, cassette was replaced iTunes, iTunes downloads
was usurped by MP3 downloads, which is being replaced with streaming on demand.
This is without the parallel evolution from MTV to YouTube and the growth from
digital internet radio stations and music discovery services such as Shazam.
Music
owners have in the past been forced to replace their collections, but the new
streaming technology now questions why they would want to reinvest yet again
when it’s all available on demand. On demand is itself is fuelling
subscription. The changes are logical but the speed of change is significant
and the redefinition of ownership has enabled many to rediscover vinyl whose
sound was of a higher quality, but its market share is still only 3.5%. When we
first started this blog we thought Spiral Frog would capture the new market,
but they failed to cross the line and their place was taken by Spotify.
Spotify
now claim 35 million songs on their service and there are many more renditions
now on services such as YouTube and SoundCloud. But even with this enormous
repository of songs many still go unheard whilst others, like butterflies have
one season in which they flourish.
When
you look at the production, distribution and business, change is often less
revolutionary and more evolutionary. Social networks and self-promotional marketing
are starting to eat away at the mid list. Unless you are in the top 1% which
generate 80% of the money, then you may have to rely on the hit makers which now
are TV driven by talent shows such as The X Factor, The Voice, Pop Idol.
To
be a hit, you now need serious financial backing, or social pull. With these
changes come changes in the reward structure for all. Some will say that there
are now too many sticky fingers in the diminishing pot. So artists are having
to rethink the old models and balance greater control and percentage of revenue,
against lower revenues and often chump change return. A good friend and musician
commented to us only this week that selling direct gave them 100% whilst
scattering to the digital unknown gave them little. Merchandise, concert
revenues and secondary rights are growing in importance. This impacts how
artists are managed, make money, record and distribute. It changes where the
producers and labels make their money and the increases the importance of the
back catalogue and Intellectual property.
So
can books learn from music?
The
consumer end is very different and what is clear is the physical book isn’t
going away in all sectors and will retain a major share of the market whilst
the distribution economics can support it. However, like music the pot is not
growing but changing and this is putting similar strains in the production and
development area of the value chain. There are many similarities here with respect
to back list, mid list and front list and self-publishing. Even signed authors
are having to work harder on their social skills as publishers rein in the
marketing and promotion to focus on the best shots.
The
one thing that all media segments share is the polarisation of value at either
end of the value chain and reducing influence of the middle to many.
No comments:
Post a Comment