The
expected new music streaming service from Apple appears to have been delayed,
not due to technology, but due to the commercial terms demanded by them. The service
is expected to be very similar to Pandora.
The music
labels want to ensure that they get a respectable return from this new revenue
stream and already it appears that the rates companies pay varies significantly.
Spotify, who are often cited as the bad
boys, are paying some 35 cents per 100 songs, whilst iHeart pays around 22
cents and Pandora only 12 cents. So is it any surprise the talks hit stale mate
when Apple wanted to only pay an initial royalty rate of 6 cents per 100 songs
streamed. To confuse the situation even further the
rate set by the Copyright Royalty Board, is around about 21 cents per 100 songs
streamed. Again three times the rate proposed by Apple.
So
we have a significant variance in the rates paid and a move to lower the bar
even further by Apple. The result would be obviously less income for the
artists and the Apple service would have to generate six times the volume of
Spotify for it to generate the same return to the labels and artists. Any
service that was paying more than Pandora today should seriously be comparing
the streaming volumes and seeking a leveller playing field which in turn could
reduce rates others are paying today and the net receipts of the labels.
Apple
propose an iRadio services supported by its iAds advertising platform. This
could bring in additional revenues to offset the low streaming rate but he
music labels want a standard fee and a percentage of ad revenues and are
cautious about a greater emphasis on somewhat variable and highly volatile advertising
revenues which could evaporate as easily as it appears.
Although all the
technology giants are looking at streamed music and no doubt global services,
we have to be somewhat cautious, as the likes of Pandora with its 67 million regular listeners isn't exactly generating huge profits today. The service like its competitors
is delivering significant growth with 4th quarter revenue up some 54% to $125
million and with mobile revenues accounting for almost 50% on the year and nearly
double at $255.9 million. However, whilst the revenue results beat Wall Street
forecasts, they remain unprofitable, reporting a net loss of $38.1 million, which is
almost double the previous year’s loss.
Despite
this uncertain backdrop and with their CEO, Joe Kennedy standing down, Pandora’s
share rose some 20%. It is clear that the markets believe in the long term
sustainability of streamed subscription and ad based music services and it is
also rumoured that Google is now in discussion on its own planned service.
No comments:
Post a Comment