Today many continue to pour the physical book content into
the digital container and believe that they have addressed the digital
opportunity. However many have also adopted the same approach to contextural
data, metadata, bibliographic, burbs etc. It’s as if we think that what works
in the physical world is equally applicable in the digital one.
Is this blind faith approach down to a conscious decision to
do as little as necessary and incur as little cost as possible, or is it a
fundamental misunderstanding of the digital environment? Some would suggest
that it’s like continuing to distribute AI sheets like confetti via a fax
machine in the email and internet age.
Way back in the eBook dark ages (the late ninties) we were
part of the highly acclaimed publishing research series edited by Mark Bide and
Mike Shatzkin, ‘Publishing in the 21st Century’ and one of the
reports we produced was simply titled ‘From N to X’ and was about the growing
importance of Context (metadata) over Content. What was clear then was that
discoverability was as important, if not more important than the content and
finding that digital needle in the Internet haystack was going to be a
challenge to all.
Interestingly, the industry choose to retain their physical
taxonomy of classification and apply restrictions often that only applied to
the physical world. It as if all we could see was physical shelves and we had
to place the titles thus. ONIX which did much to provide structure for the
physical B2B supply chain started to become increasingly irrelevant in the B2C
ebook supply chain. The major ebook retailers all adopted their own
classification taxonomies some permitting many genre classifications others a
few. Keywords became important but the response was varied. The important blurb
was often just the physical one again merely poured into the digital description.
Some indexed the first chapter, others the whole book, but searching index
words often then became highly subjective and often irrelevant to the intended
search. As seen with some generic search engines today even your individual
profile may present different search results to others.
Some battled with the
semantic tagging of the likes of illustrations. Some sectors recognised the
importance of citations, references and continued to support those established
to manage these in the physical world.
The point is that we have a very rich bank of potential
information that can aid discoverability and qualification. The richest source
of content metadata being in the book itself. Some 95% of all contextual data
is available via the book with the remaining being often available via
hyperlinks.
The other source of information comes from our own profiles
on our tastes, preferences and habits. Some will say that one of the reasons
why social book sites work well is that they aid discoverability,
recommendations and thereby add context. Its little surprise therefore that
Amazon bought Goodreads and have just launched their Twitter relationship. Book
recommending social services have mushroomed but have they actually increased sales to the
same proportion or are they just an extension of today’s ‘me too’ social dating
society?
We therefore need to rethink what we give away to promote,
aid discoverability and add value to drive sales. Merely to continue to pour
the same physical information into the digital boxes is not going to work.
Equally waiting for the white knight to provide the solution may well now carry
a health warning.
No comments:
Post a Comment